Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: asm/div64.h: adjust to generic codde

[Måns Rullgård]

Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> +static inline uint64_t __arch_xprod_64(uint64_t m, uint64_t n, bool bias)
> +{
> +	unsigned long long res;
> +	unsigned int tmp = 0;
> +
> +	if (!bias) {
> +		asm (	"umull	%Q0, %R0, %Q1, %Q2\n\t"
> +			"mov	%Q0, #0"
> +			: "=&r" (res)
> +			: "r" (m), "r" (n)
> +			: "cc");
> +	} else if (!(m & ((1ULL << 63) | (1ULL << 31)))) {
> +		res = m;
> +		asm (	"umlal	%Q0, %R0, %Q1, %Q2\n\t"
> +			"mov	%Q0, #0"
> +			: "+&r" (res)
> +			: "r" (m), "r" (n)
> +			: "cc");
> +	} else {
> +		asm (	"umull	%Q0, %R0, %Q2, %Q3\n\t"
> +			"cmn	%Q0, %Q2\n\t"
> +			"adcs	%R0, %R0, %R2\n\t"
> +			"adc	%Q0, %1, #0"
> +			: "=&r" (res), "+&r" (tmp)
> +			: "r" (m), "r" (n)

Why is tmp using a +r constraint here?  The register is not written, so
using an input-only operand could/should result in better code.  That is
also what the old code did.

> +			: "cc");
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!(m & ((1ULL << 63) | (1ULL << 31)))) {
> +		asm (	"umlal	%R0, %Q0, %R1, %Q2\n\t"
> +			"umlal	%R0, %Q0, %Q1, %R2\n\t"
> +			"mov	%R0, #0\n\t"
> +			"umlal	%Q0, %R0, %R1, %R2"
> +			: "+&r" (res)
> +			: "r" (m), "r" (n)
> +			: "cc");
> +	} else {
> +		asm (	"umlal	%R0, %Q0, %R2, %Q3\n\t"
> +			"umlal	%R0, %1, %Q2, %R3\n\t"
> +			"mov	%R0, #0\n\t"
> +			"adds	%Q0, %1, %Q0\n\t"
> +			"adc	%R0, %R0, #0\n\t"
> +			"umlal	%Q0, %R0, %R2, %R3"
> +			: "+&r" (res), "+&r" (tmp)
> +			: "r" (m), "r" (n)
> +			: "cc");
> +	}
> +
> +	return res;
> +}

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mans@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/