Re: [PATCH] perf test: Add bpf-output event
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Date: Thu Nov 19 2015 - 18:32:15 EST
Wangnan (F) [wangnan0@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
| On 2015/11/19 7:14, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
| >On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:50:39PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
| >>Em Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:26:04AM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu escreveu:
| >>>>From 8f71d55dd3e27e6ca2138e3ed6dfeceb1c00a426 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
| >>>From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| >>>Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:06:08 -0500
| >>>Subject: [PATCH] perf test: Add bpf-output event
| >>>The kernel has added support for 'PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT' but that is
| >>>missing from the perf tool. Among other things, results in the 'roundtrip
| >>>evsel->name check' test case of 'perf test' failing on Powerpc.
| >>Next time can you please state if this is for this merge window or for
| >>the next?
| >>Will apply it for perf/core, for the next merge window.
| >wait a sec, I believe Wang has posted an RFC a month ago that adds support
| >for this properly instead of simply shutting up the error.
| Yes. Please have a look at
| and patch 23/31 - 31/31 in
| We are working on a solution which truly utilizes bpf-output, including
| filling event array and extracting BPF output through perf data to CTF
| format. Now they are separated in multiple patchset, and I'd like to
| resend them to Arnaldo in this week.
Ok. It looked like there was development going on around BPF so I put
in the stubs to avoid false positives in the perf test. There is a BPF
filter test case that is also getting Skipped. Would this patchset address
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/