RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] igb: improve handling of disconnected adapters

From: Brown, Aaron F
Date: Thu Nov 19 2015 - 23:40:37 EST

> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Jarod Wilson
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 8:52 AM
> To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>; intel-wired-
> lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] igb: improve handling of disconnected
> adapters
> Clean up array_rd32 so that it uses igb_rd32 the same as rd32, per the
> suggestion of Alexander Duyck, and use io_addr in more places, so that
> we don't have the need to call E1000_REMOVED (which simply looks for a
> null hw_addr) nearly as much.
> CC: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Note: this patch is rebased on Jeff's next-queue/dev-queue branch, which
> already had an earlier revision of this applied, so I've essentially
> reverted a2675ab and applied the revised version of this, squashed them
> together, and here is the end result, which matches the version Alex acked.
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_regs.h | 3 +--
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 15 ++-------------
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at