Re: [PATCH v11 3/5] arm: introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING and pv_time_ops

From: Christopher Covington
Date: Fri Nov 20 2015 - 09:36:13 EST

Hi Stefano,

On 11/20/2015 09:31 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so no
>>> runtime pvops patching needed.
>>> This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen
>>> ticks accounting.
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Christopher Covington <cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> CC: will.deacon@xxxxxxx
>>> CC: nico@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> CC: marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx
>>> CC: cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> CC: arnd@xxxxxxxx
>>> CC: olof@xxxxxxxxx
>> Russell,
>> are you OK with this patch?
> Russell,
> I am going to drop this patch and add a small #ifdef to
> arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c to be able to use this functionality on arm64.
> If you change your mind let me know.

It appears to me as though he's not copied on this message.

Christopher Covington

Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at