Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] toshiba_acpi: Add WWAN RFKill support

[Darren Hart]

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:49:25AM -0700, Azael Avalos wrote:

Hi Azael,

> A previuos patch added WWAN support to the driver, allowing to query
> and set the device status.
> 
> This patch adds RFKill support for the recently introduced WWAN device,
> making use of the WWAN and *wireless_status functions to query the
> killswitch and (de)activate the device accordingly to its status.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Koester <fabian.koester@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

So this is Fabian's code which he sent to you and you are submitting on his
behalf?

> Signed-off-by: Azael Avalos <coproscefalo@xxxxxxxxx>


A couple minor nits below.

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> index 60d1ad9..d1315c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dmi.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/rfkill.h>
>  #include <linux/toshiba.h>
>  #include <acpi/video.h>
>  
> @@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ struct toshiba_acpi_dev {
>  	struct led_classdev kbd_led;
>  	struct led_classdev eco_led;
>  	struct miscdevice miscdev;
> +	struct rfkill *wwan_rfk;
>  
>  	int force_fan;
>  	int last_key_event;
> @@ -2330,6 +2332,67 @@ static const struct file_operations toshiba_acpi_fops = {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> + * WWAN RFKill handlers
> + */
> +static int toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block(void *data, bool blocked)
> +{
> +	struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (!dev->killswitch)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return toshiba_wwan_set(dev, blocked ? 0 : 1);

You can avoid the ternary operation with binary output and just invert the
bool.

!blocked


> +}
> +
> +static void toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll(struct rfkill *rfkill, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev = data;
> +
> +	if (toshiba_wireless_status(dev))
> +		return;
> +
> +	rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rfkill_ops wwan_rfk_ops = {
> +	.set_block = toshiba_acpi_wwan_set_block,
> +	.poll = toshiba_acpi_wwan_poll,
> +};
> +
> +static int toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	int ret = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	dev->wwan_rfk = rfkill_alloc("Toshiba WWAN",
> +				     &dev->acpi_dev->dev,
> +				     RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN,
> +				     &wwan_rfk_ops,
> +				     dev);
> +	if (!dev->wwan_rfk) {
> +		pr_err("Unable to allocate WWAN rfkill device\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
> +
> +	ret = rfkill_register(dev->wwan_rfk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("Unable to register WWAN rfkill device\n");
> +		rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * Hotkeys
>   */
>  static int toshiba_acpi_enable_hotkeys(struct toshiba_acpi_dev *dev)
> @@ -2688,6 +2751,11 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>  	if (dev->eco_led_registered)
>  		led_classdev_unregister(&dev->eco_led);
>  
> +	if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
> +		rfkill_unregister(dev->wwan_rfk);
> +		rfkill_destroy(dev->wwan_rfk);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (toshiba_acpi)
>  		toshiba_acpi = NULL;
>  
> @@ -2827,6 +2895,8 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev)
>  	dev->fan_supported = !ret;
>  
>  	toshiba_wwan_available(dev);
> +	if (dev->wwan_supported)
> +		toshiba_acpi_setup_wwan_rfkill(dev);
>  
>  	print_supported_features(dev);
>  
> @@ -2930,6 +3000,15 @@ static int toshiba_acpi_resume(struct device *device)
>  			pr_info("Unable to re-enable hotkeys\n");
>  	}
>  
> +	if (dev->wwan_rfk) {
> +		int error = toshiba_wireless_status(dev);
> +
> +		if (error)
> +			return error;

For consistency, please use ret. You can just initialize it to 0 outside the if
block, use it inside, and return it outside as well. We don't buy much by
declaring inside the if block on a resume function.

> +
> +		rfkill_set_hw_state(dev->wwan_rfk, !dev->killswitch);
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.6.2
> 
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/