Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sun Nov 22 2015 - 01:52:54 EST
On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Adding devicetree list.
>
> Thread starts at
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354459.html
>
> On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [151105 03:41]:
> >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>>> * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [151012 13:29]:
> >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments
> >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree
> >>>>>> what needs to be done.
>
> I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this series.
> My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transport
> mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object).
Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone?
I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would
be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/