Re: [PATCH 2/9] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 11:51:13AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>> Hello Christoph,
>>
>> The comment about locality in the above quote is interesting. How about
>> modifying patch 2/9 as indicated below ? The modification below does not
>> change the behavior of this patch if ib_cq.w.cpu is not modified. And it
>> allows users who care about locality and who want to skip the scheduler
>> overhead by setting ib_cq.w.cpu to the index of the CPU they want the
>> work to be processed on.
>
> That sounds acceptable...

Wouldn't it be a better idea to set the WQ_SYSFS interface and use
the standard sysfs interface for specifying cpumasks or node affinity?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/