Re: Re: [PATCH 6/6] PM / devfreq: Set the min_freq and max_freq of devfreq device

[Chanwoo Choi]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> []
>> >
>> > The value 0 is used for min/max_freq to declare
>> > that min/max_freq is deactivated. Therefore, it is not
>> > required to do so; they are not intended to show the hardware
>> > configuration as well.
>>
>> This case consider the devfreq device using OPP because devfreq_set_freq_table()
>> get the number of OPP entry in OPP list before setting the min_freq/max_freq.
>> If the devfreq device don't use the OPP entry, devfreq_set_freq_table()
>> will return without any operation.
>>
>> IMHO, when devfreq device uses the OPP table including the frequency,
>> min_freq/max_freq should show the correct value as CPUFREQ framework.
>>
>
> The side effect of this patch shows up when opp_disable() and opp_enable()
> are used.

Ah. You're right.
I was not considering the the case of using opp_disable() and opp_enable().
I'll consider it again including the usage case of opp_diable/opp_enable.

Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/