[PATCH 3.12 27/72] mfd: wm5110: Add register patch for rev D chip

From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Mon Nov 23 2015 - 08:23:52 EST


From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 02915661dbb91b25b621ab3f387ab55311bded7f upstream.

Evaluation of revision D of WM5110 suggests updates to the register
patch for optimal performance. For the sake of clarity rev C of the chip
does not require a register patch.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <ONeukum@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c b/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c
index 3113e39b318e..f1854d5aa55f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c
@@ -223,6 +223,31 @@ static const struct reg_default wm5110_revb_patch[] = {
{ 0x80, 0x0 },
};

+static const struct reg_default wm5110_revd_patch[] = {
+ { 0x80, 0x3 },
+ { 0x80, 0x3 },
+ { 0x393, 0x27 },
+ { 0x394, 0x27 },
+ { 0x395, 0x27 },
+ { 0x396, 0x27 },
+ { 0x397, 0x27 },
+ { 0x398, 0x26 },
+ { 0x221, 0x90 },
+ { 0x211, 0x8 },
+ { 0x36c, 0x1fb },
+ { 0x26e, 0x64 },
+ { 0x26f, 0xea },
+ { 0x270, 0x1f16 },
+ { 0x51b, 0x1 },
+ { 0x55b, 0x1 },
+ { 0x59b, 0x1 },
+ { 0x4f0, 0x633 },
+ { 0x441, 0xc059 },
+ { 0x209, 0x27 },
+ { 0x80, 0x0 },
+ { 0x80, 0x0 },
+};
+
/* We use a function so we can use ARRAY_SIZE() */
int wm5110_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
{
@@ -235,7 +260,10 @@ int wm5110_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
wm5110_revb_patch,
ARRAY_SIZE(wm5110_revb_patch));
-
+ case 3:
+ return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
+ wm5110_revd_patch,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(wm5110_revd_patch));
default:
return 0;
}
--
2.6.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/