Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest
From: Fengguang Wu
Date: Mon Nov 23 2015 - 10:03:32 EST
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang
> >> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees.
> > Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch?
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt
> I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and
> everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is
> that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major
> kernel release.
Thanks! Yes, a stable branch name would be better than "linux-4.1.y-rt"
that's like to become stable over time.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/