Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add Allwinner H3 DTSI

From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Mon Nov 23 2015 - 11:49:16 EST

Next message: Andreas Schwab: "Re: [RFC2 PATCH v6 00/19] ILP32 for ARM64"
Previous message: Sekhar Nori: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: keystone: fix crash with deferred probe"
In reply to: Jens Kuske: "Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add Allwinner H3 DTSI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> HI,
>
>
> On 23-11-15 09:57, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 02:33:23PM +0100, Jens Kuske wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> + bus_gates: clk@01c20060 {
>>>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + compatible =
>>>>> "allwinner,sun8i-h3-bus-gates-clk";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c20060 0x14>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&ahb1>, <&ahb2>, <&apb1>, <&apb2>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "ahb1", "ahb2", "apb1", "apb2";
>>>>> + clock-indices = <5>, <6>, <8>,
>>>>> + <9>, <10>, <13>,
>>>>> + <14>, <17>, <18>,
>>>>> + <19>, <20>,
>>>>> + <21>, <23>,
>>>>> + <24>, <25>,
>>>>> + <26>, <27>,
>>>>> + <28>, <29>,
>>>>> + <30>, <31>, <32>,
>>>>> + <35>, <36>, <37>,
>>>>> + <40>, <41>, <43>,
>>>>> + <44>, <52>, <53>,
>>>>> + <54>, <64>,
>>>>> + <65>, <69>, <72>,
>>>>> + <76>, <77>, <78>,
>>>>> + <96>, <97>, <98>,
>>>>> + <112>, <113>,
>>>>> + <114>, <115>, <116>,
>>>>> + <128>, <135>;
>>>>> + clock-output-names = "ahb1_ce", "ahb1_dma",
>>>>> "ahb1_mmc0",
>>>>> + "ahb1_mmc1", "ahb1_mmc2",
>>>>> "ahb1_nand",
>>>>> + "ahb1_sdram", "ahb2_gmac",
>>>>> "ahb1_ts",
>>>>> + "ahb1_hstimer", "ahb1_spi0",
>>>>> + "ahb1_spi1", "ahb1_otg",
>>>>> + "ahb1_otg_ehci0", "ahb1_ehic1",
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ahb1_ehci1? Same for the following 3 lines.
>>>
>>> I'll fix them...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + "ahb1_ehic2", "ahb1_ehic3",
>>>>> + "ahb1_otg_ohci0", "ahb2_ohic1",
>>>>> + "ahb2_ohic2", "ahb2_ohic3",
>>>>> "ahb1_ve",
>>>>> + "ahb1_lcd0", "ahb1_lcd1",
>>>>> "ahb1_deint",
>>>>> + "ahb1_csi", "ahb1_tve",
>>>>> "ahb1_hdmi",
>>>>> + "ahb1_de", "ahb1_gpu",
>>>>> "ahb1_msgbox",
>>>>> + "ahb1_spinlock", "apb1_codec",
>>>>> + "apb1_spdif", "apb1_pio",
>>>>> "apb1_ths",
>>>>> + "apb1_i2s0", "apb1_i2s1",
>>>>> "apb1_i2s2",
>>>>> + "apb2_i2c0", "apb2_i2c1",
>>>>> "apb2_i2c2",
>>>>> + "apb2_uart0", "apb2_uart1",
>>>>> + "apb2_uart2", "apb2_uart3",
>>>>> "apb2_scr",
>>>>> + "ahb1_ephy", "ahb1_dbg";
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If it weren't for the last 2 clocks, we could cleanly split out apb1 and
>>>> apb2
>>>> gates. Having a separate AHB clock gate taking 2 addresses seems messy
>>>> as well. :(
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, maybe we still should do that, if we split the resets too at least
>>> apb[12] would line up again.
>>>
>>> I don't know what to do with these bus things any more, all variants I
>>> sent had issues somewhere...
>>
>>
>> AFAIK, Arnd had some objections, but he never got back to us when we
>> explained how the hardware was laid out, so I don't know if they still
>> apply.
>>
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc0_clk: clk@01c20088 {
>>>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-mmc-clk";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c20088 0x4>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 0>, <&pll8 0>;
>>>>> + clock-output-names = "mmc0",
>>>>> + "mmc0_output",
>>>>> + "mmc0_sample";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc1_clk: clk@01c2008c {
>>>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-mmc-clk";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c2008c 0x4>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 0>, <&pll8 0>;
>>>>> + clock-output-names = "mmc1",
>>>>> + "mmc1_output",
>>>>> + "mmc1_sample";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc2_clk: clk@01c20090 {
>>>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-mmc-clk";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c20090 0x4>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 0>, <&pll8 0>;
>>>>> + clock-output-names = "mmc2",
>>>>> + "mmc2_output",
>>>>> + "mmc2_sample";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mbus_clk: clk@01c2015c {
>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-mbus-clk";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c2015c 0x4>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&osc24M>, <&pll6 1>, <&pll5>;
>>>>> + clock-output-names = "mbus";
>>>>> + };
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + soc {
>>>>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + ranges;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + dma: dma-controller@01c02000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-dma";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c02000 0x1000>;
>>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 50 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&bus_gates 6>;
>>>>> + resets = <&bus_rst 6>;
>>>>> + #dma-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc0: mmc@01c0f000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c0f000 0x1000>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&bus_gates 8>,
>>>>> + <&mmc0_clk 0>,
>>>>> + <&mmc0_clk 1>,
>>>>> + <&mmc0_clk 2>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "ahb",
>>>>> + "mmc",
>>>>> + "output",
>>>>> + "sample";
>>>>> + resets = <&bus_rst 8>;
>>>>> + reset-names = "ahb";
>>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 60 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc1: mmc@01c10000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c10000 0x1000>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&bus_gates 9>,
>>>>> + <&mmc1_clk 0>,
>>>>> + <&mmc1_clk 1>,
>>>>> + <&mmc1_clk 2>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "ahb",
>>>>> + "mmc",
>>>>> + "output",
>>>>> + "sample";
>>>>> + resets = <&bus_rst 9>;
>>>>> + reset-names = "ahb";
>>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 61 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc2: mmc@01c11000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c11000 0x1000>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&bus_gates 10>,
>>>>> + <&mmc2_clk 0>,
>>>>> + <&mmc2_clk 1>,
>>>>> + <&mmc2_clk 2>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "ahb",
>>>>> + "mmc",
>>>>> + "output",
>>>>> + "sample";
>>>>> + resets = <&bus_rst 10>;
>>>>> + reset-names = "ahb";
>>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 62 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + pio: pinctrl@01c20800 {
>>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-pinctrl";
>>>>> + reg = <0x01c20800 0x400>;
>>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>>> + <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>> + clocks = <&bus_gates 69>;
>>>>> + gpio-controller;
>>>>> + #gpio-cells = <3>;
>>>>> + interrupt-controller;
>>>>> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + uart0_pins_a: uart0@0 {
>>>>> + allwinner,pins = "PA4", "PA5";
>>>>> + allwinner,function = "uart0";
>>>>> + allwinner,drive =
>>>>> <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>;
>>>>> + allwinner,pull =
>>>>> <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc0_pins_a: mmc0@0 {
>>>>> + allwinner,pins = "PF0", "PF1", "PF2",
>>>>> "PF3",
>>>>> + "PF4", "PF5";
>>>>> + allwinner,function = "mmc0";
>>>>> + allwinner,drive =
>>>>> <SUN4I_PINCTRL_30_MA>;
>>>>> + allwinner,pull =
>>>>> <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmc0_cd_pin: mmc0_cd_pin@0 {
>>>>> + allwinner,pins = "PF6";
>>>>> + allwinner,function = "gpio_in";
>>>>> + allwinner,drive =
>>>>> <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>;
>>>>> + allwinner,pull =
>>>>> <SUN4I_PINCTRL_PULL_UP>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This should be in the board DTS, unless this is the reference design,
>>>> in which case you should name the label like
>>>> "mmc0_cd_pin_reference_design".
>>>>
>>>
>>> The datasheet mentions SDC0_DET function on PF6
>
>
> Hmm, not in my version, I've "Allwinner_H3_Datasheet_V1.0.pdf" and there
> PF6 only has generic input / output functionality.

v1.1 has an "SDC0_DET" function for PF6 in the GPIO mux functions table.

>>> so I thought this is
>>>
>>> sort of fixed to this pin now. All designs I've seen use this pin.
>>
>>
>> Why is it set as a gpio then if it is a separate function?
>
>
> I guess because we do not support this in the mmc driver yet. Also on
> older devices the mmc controller has build-in card-detection features
> (using the data lines in that case) but we've never supported this since
> none of the boards sofar have been using it.

Unfortunately the H3 datasheet does not include a section for MMC.
I've requested the datasheet be publicly released with MMC and PRCM
sections included:

https://github.com/allwinner-zh/documents/issues/9

ChenYu

> For now we can just treat PF6 as a gpio, until someone figures out how
> to do this inside the mmc driver.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andreas Schwab: "Re: [RFC2 PATCH v6 00/19] ILP32 for ARM64"
Previous message: Sekhar Nori: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: keystone: fix crash with deferred probe"
In reply to: Jens Kuske: "Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add Allwinner H3 DTSI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]