Re: [RFC] asm-generic: default BUG_ON(x) to "if(x) BUG()"

From: Josh Triplett
Date: Mon Nov 23 2015 - 15:20:14 EST

Two comments inline below.

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:25:28PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When CONFIG_BUG is disabled, BUG_ON() will only evaluate the condition,
> but will not actually stop the current thread. GCC warns about a couple
> of BUG_ON() users where this actually leads to further undefined
> behavior:
> include/linux/ceph/osdmap.h: In function 'ceph_can_shift_osds':
> include/linux/ceph/osdmap.h:54:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
> fs/ext4/inode.c: In function 'ext4_map_blocks':
> fs/ext4/inode.c:548:5: warning: 'retval' may be used uninitialized in this function
> drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c: In function 'prcmu_config_clkout':
> drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:762:10: warning: 'div_mask' may be used uninitialized in this function
> drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:769:13: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized in this function
> drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:757:7: warning: 'bits' may be used uninitialized in this function
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c: In function 'univ8250_release_irq':
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:252:18: warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized in this function
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:235:19: note: 'i' was declared here

Eliminating the spurious warnings seems like a good reason to do this.

> There is an obvious conflict of interest here: on the one hand, someone
> who disables CONFIG_BUG() will want the kernel to be as small as possible
> and doesn't care about printing error messages to a console that nobody
> looks at. On the other hand, running into a BUG_ON() condition means that
> something has gone wrong, and we probably want to also stop doing things
> that might cause data corruption.

Seems like you should adjust the Kconfig description for 'config BUG' in
init/Kconfig to account for BUG/BUG_ON still stopping the machine.

(For that matter, I can't help but wonder if we could then consolidate
CONFIG_BUG and CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE, since we now only semantically
change whether and how much we print. However, that could happen in
another patch.)

> This patch picks the second choice, and changes the NOP to BUG(), which
> normally stops the execution of the current thread in some form (endless
> loop or a trap). This follows the logic we applied in a4b5d580e078 ("bug:
> Make BUG() always stop the machine").
> For ARM multi_v7_defconfig, the size slightly increases:
> section CONFIG_BUG=y CONFIG_BUG=n CONFIG_BUG=n+patch
> .text 8320248 | 8180944 | 8207688
> .rodata 3633720 | 3567144 | 3570648
> __bug_table 32508 | --- | ---
> __modver 692 | 1584 | 2176
> .init.text 558132 | 548300 | 550088
> .exit.text 12380 | 12256 | 12380
> .data 1016672 | 1016064 | 1016128
> Total 14622556 | 14374510 | 14407326
> So instead of saving 1.70% of the total image size, we only save 1.48%

Could you please include numbers for tinyconfig as well? Percentages
get larger when the numbers get smaller.

> by turning off CONFIG_BUG, but in return we can ensure that we don't run
> into cases of uninitialized variable or return code uses when something
> bad happens. Aside from that, we significantly reduce the number of
> warnings in randconfig builds, which makes it easier to fix the warnings
> about other problems.
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> index 630dd2372238..58bd1f08c5c7 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
> #endif
> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON
> -#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) ; } while (0)
> +#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) BUG(); } while (0)

This makes BUG_ON in the !CONFIG_BUG case almost identical to the
CONFIG_BUG=y case, except for the use of unlikely(condition), which this
ought to do as well.

Given that, could you pull the definition *out* of the #ifdef/#else for
CONFIG_BUG entirely, and define it the same way in both cases?

- Josh Triplett
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at