Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] Crypto kernel tls socket

[Sowmini Varadhan]

On (11/23/15 13:43), Dave Watson wrote:
> 
> For kcm, opfd is the fd you would pass along in kcm_attach.
> For rds, it looks like you'd want to use opfd as the sock instead of
> the new one created by sock_create_kern in rds_tcp_conn_connect.

I see.

It's something to consider, and it would certainly secure the
RDS header and app data, but TLS by itself may not be
enough- we'd need to protect the TCP control plane as well, and 
at the moment, I'm finding that even using esp-null (or AO, or MD5,
for that matter) means that I lose GSO, and perf tanks. I'll try to
put all my data together for this for netdev 1.1.


> > E.g., if I get a cipher-suite request outside the aes-ni, what would
> > happen (punt to uspace?)
> >
> > --Sowmini
> 
> Right, bind() would fail and you would fallback to uspace.

That's the approach that Solaris KSSL took, back in 1999. It quickly
became obsolete, again more details in netdev 1.1.

--Sowmini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/