Re: linux-next: clean up the kbuild tree?
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Mon Nov 23 2015 - 21:12:43 EST
> > 5.x is better than 4.x but it's still a slower. It's also not incremential.
> At the last time I tested with the latest 5.x and stock binutils on
> openSUSE Tumbleweed, I failed to build, unfortunately. Partly the
> detection of gcc version doesn't work for 5.x, and partly something is
Really? It work for me with gcc 5
> missing in binutils side, although it's already built with plugin.
Yes it needs HJ Lu's Linux binutils, not the standard FSF binutils.
The patch to fix LTO with ld -r was submitted to standard binutils, but they
didn't want to fix the issue.
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/