Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf tools: Introduce perf_thread for backtrace
From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Tue Nov 24 2015 - 02:37:04 EST
Hi Jiri,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:29:48AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:03:03PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Backtrace is a crucial info for debugging. And upcoming refcnt
> > tracking facility also wants to use it.
> >
> > So instead of relying on glibc's backtrace_symbols[_fd] which misses
> > some (static) functions , use our own symbol searching mechanism. To
> > do that, add perf_thread global variable to keep its maps and symbols.
> >
> > The backtrace output from TUI is changed like below. (I made a key
> > action to generate a segfault for testing):
> >
> > Before:
> > perf: Segmentation fault
> > -------- backtrace --------
> > perf[0x544a8b]
> > /usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x33680)[0x7fc46420b680]
> > perf[0x54041b]
> > perf(perf_evlist__tui_browse_hists+0x91)[0x5432e1]
> > perf(cmd_report+0x1d20)[0x43cb10]
> > perf[0x487073]
> > perf(main+0x62f)[0x42cb1f]
> > /usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf0)[0x7fc4641f8610]
> > perf(_start+0x29)[0x42cc39]
> > [0x0]
> >
> > After:
> > perf: Segmentation fault
> > -------- backtrace --------
> > perf_evsel__hists_browse(+0x43b) in perf [0x54066b]
> > perf_evlist__tui_browse_hists(+0x91) in perf [0x543531]
> > cmd_report(+0x1d20) in perf [0x43cb50]
> > run_builtin(+0x53) in perf [0x4870b3]
> > main(+0x634) in perf [0x42cb54]
> > __libc_start_main(+0xf0) in libc-2.22.so [0x7fea3577c610]
> > _start(+0x29) in perf [0x42cc79]
> > [0x0]
>
> nice idea!
>
> SNIP
>
> > +
> > +void create_perf_thread(void)
> > +{
> > + struct perf_tool tool = {
> > + .comm = perf_event__process_comm,
> > + .mmap = perf_event__process_mmap,
> > + .mmap2 = perf_event__process_mmap2,
> > + };
> > + struct thread_map *tm;
> > + struct machine *machine;
> > + int pid = getpid();
> > +
> > + machine = machine__new_host();
> > + if (machine == NULL)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + tm = thread_map__new_dummy();
> > + if (tm == NULL) {
> > + machine__delete(machine);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> I think we could treat errors the usual way in here..
> if fail to alloc this early, something is terribly wrong anyway
OK, I'll change it to return error code and let perf fail with it.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/