Re: [PATCH v3 09/22] kthread: Allow to cancel kthread work

[Petr Mladek]

On Mon 2015-11-23 17:58:23, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:25:14PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > +static int
> > +try_to_cancel_kthread_work(struct kthread_work *work,
> > +				   spinlock_t *lock,
> > +				   unsigned long *flags)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (work->timer) {
> > +		/* Try to cancel the timer if pending. */
> > +		if (del_timer(work->timer)) {
> > +			ret = 1;
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/* Are we racing with the timer callback? */
> > +		if (timer_active(work->timer)) {
> > +			/* Bad luck, need to avoid a deadlock. */
> > +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
> > +			del_timer_sync(work->timer);
> > +			ret = -EAGAIN;
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> 
> As the timer side is already kinda trylocking anyway, can't the cancel
> path be made simpler?  Sth like
> 
> 	lock(worker);
> 	work->canceling = true;
> 	del_timer_sync(work->timer);
> 	unlock(worker);
> 
> And the timer can do (ignoring the multiple worker support, do we even
> need that?)
> 
> 	while (!trylock(worker)) {
> 		if (work->canceling)
> 			return;
> 		cpu_relax();
> 	}
> 	queue;
> 	unlock(worker);

Why did I not find out this myself ?:-)

Thanks for hint,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/