Re: [PATCH] perf record: Add snapshot mode support for perf's regular events

[David Ahern]

On 11/24/15 8:40 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> perf-record without his patch? yes, but with his patch it does:
>
>      __cmd_record()
>          for (;;)
>              record__mmap_read_all()
>                  record__write()
>                      perf_memory__write()
> 			event = (union perf_event *)(memory->start + memory->head + skip);
>                          if (event->header.type != PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE) {
>                              if (buf_to_file(rec, memory->start, memory->size,
>                          }
>
> I almost thought that I had been fooled by the difficulty to follow his
> patch and was forgetting that 'perf record' doesn't processes events,
> and hasn't done so for a very good reason: to reduce its impact on the
> observed workload, but that ain't so, no?

exactly. And I missed the above. Thanks for pointing that out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/