Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf: Migrate perf to use new tick dependency mask model

From: Chris Metcalf
Date: Tue Nov 24 2015 - 11:19:55 EST


On 11/13/2015 09:22 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Instead of providing asynchronous checks for the nohz subsystem to verify
perf event tick dependency, migrate perf to the new mask.

Perf needs the tick for two situations:

1) Freq events. We could set the tick dependency when those are
installed on a CPU context. But setting a global dependency on top of
the global freq events accounting is much easier. If people want that
to be optimized, we can still refine that on the per-CPU tick dependency
level. This patch dooesn't change the current behaviour anyway.

2) Throttled events: this is a per-cpu dependency.


@@ -3540,8 +3530,10 @@ static void unaccount_event(struct perf_event *event)
atomic_dec(&nr_comm_events);
if (event->attr.task)
atomic_dec(&nr_task_events);
- if (event->attr.freq)
- atomic_dec(&nr_freq_events);
+ if (event->attr.freq) {
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&nr_freq_events))
+ tick_nohz_clear_dep(TICK_PERF_EVENTS_BIT);
+ }
if (event->attr.context_switch) {
static_key_slow_dec_deferred(&perf_sched_events);
atomic_dec(&nr_switch_events);

@@ -7695,7 +7687,7 @@ static void account_event(struct perf_event *event)
atomic_inc(&nr_task_events);
if (event->attr.freq) {
if (atomic_inc_return(&nr_freq_events) == 1)
- tick_nohz_full_kick_all();
+ tick_nohz_set_dep(TICK_PERF_EVENTS_BIT);
}
if (event->attr.context_switch) {
atomic_inc(&nr_switch_events);

It would be helpful to have a comment explaining why these two
can't race with each other, e.g. this race:

[cpu 1] atomic_dec_and_test
[cpu 2] atomic_inc_return
[cpu 2] tick_nohz_set_dep()
[cpu 1] tick_nohz_clear_dep()

Or perhaps this is a true race condition possibility?

I think we're OK for the sched cases since they're protected under
the rq lock, I think. I'm not sure about the POSIX cpu timers.

--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/