Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] watchdog: Introduce hardware maximum timeout in watchdog core
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Tue Nov 24 2015 - 16:14:20 EST
Hello Guenter,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 08:45:05AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/24/2015 08:11 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:03:13AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>thanks a lot for the Ack. I have v6 in the works, which changes recording
> >>of last_keepalive when the watchdog is started. Does your Ack include that
> >>change, or do you prefer to have another look ?
> >
> >this change is to sample jiffies before .start is called as I suggested,
> >right? For that change keeping my ack is ok of course.
> >
>
> Correct. This is how the code now looks like.
>
> started_at = jiffies;
> if (watchdog_hw_running(wdd) && wdd->ops->ping)
> err = wdd->ops->ping(wdd);
> else
> err = wdd->ops->start(wdd);
> if (err == 0) {
> set_bit(WDOG_ACTIVE, &wdd->status);
> wdd->last_keepalive = started_at;
> watchdog_update_worker(wdd);
> }
\o/
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/