Re: [V5 PATCH 2/4] panic/x86: Allow cpus to save registers even if they are looping in NMI context

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:46:37AM +0000, æåèå / KAWAIïHIDEHIRO wrote:
> Does *old* code mean the code without this patch *series* ?

Yes.

> I prefer this, but we might want to add some more prefix or suffix.
> For example, "conditionally_run_crash_nmi_callback".

That's unnecessary IMO. If you need to express that, you could write
that in a comment above the function definition. Anyone who looks at
the code then will know that it is conditional, like so many other
kernel functions. :)

> Thanks for your deep review!

Thanks for the patience!

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/