[RFC 1/1] xen: block: correct setting for xen_blkif_max_ring_order
From: Peng Fan
Date: Wed Nov 25 2015 - 05:26:31 EST
According to this piece code:
"
pr_info("Invalid max_ring_order (%d), will use default max: %d.\n",
xen_blkif_max_ring_order, XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER);
"
if xen_blkif_max_ring_order is bigger that XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER,
need to set xen_blkif_max_ring_order using XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER,
but not 0.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Roger Pau MonnÃ" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi,
I am new to xen and reading related soure code, not sure whether
this is correct. Please comments.
Thanks
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
index 0823a96..883b9fa 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
@@ -2126,7 +2126,7 @@ static int __init xlblk_init(void)
if (xen_blkif_max_ring_order > XENBUS_MAX_RING_PAGE_ORDER) {
pr_info("Invalid max_ring_order (%d), will use default max: %d.\n",
xen_blkif_max_ring_order, XENBUS_MAX_RING_PAGE_ORDER);
- xen_blkif_max_ring_order = 0;
+ xen_blkif_max_ring_order = XENBUS_MAX_RING_PAGE_ORDER;
}
if (!xen_has_pv_disk_devices())
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/