Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] zram: pass gfp from zcomp frontend to backend

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

Hello,

On (11/25/15 22:50), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> > I think that applying 3/3 before 2/3 will be a simpler (and probably a better)
> > thing to do. We fitst extend zcomp interface and pass flags (without any
> > functional change) and then extend the flags and introduce vmalloc fallback.
> 
> The reason I ordered such way is that I wanted to discuss [2/3] as
> stable material after I get your ACK. It solves real problem in android platform
> which is real fact and I think it's enough small to send stable tree.
> What do you think?
> 
> > 
> > So we don't have to add comments to lz4/lzo backend that are getting (re-)moved
> > in the very next commit.
> 
> Fair enough if you don't agree sending [2/3] to stable.

Aha, I see. I don't mind to send it to -stable (with __GFP_HIGHMEM fix
up).

Do -stable guys take this type of patches?

	-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/