Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] device core: add BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER_ERROR notification

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:09 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 26, 2015 05:19:07 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > In case ->probe() fails the notifier does not inform a subscriber
> > about this.
> > In the result it might happend that some resources that had been
> > allocated will
> > stay allocated and therefore lead to resource leak.
> > 
> > Introduce a new notification to inform the subscriber that
> > ->probe() failed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I'd rather say the problem is that the users of
> BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER have no
> chance to do any cleanup in case of a probe failure (there may be
> problems even
> if resources aren't leaked).

Thanks, Rafael, all of your comments sound reasonable for me. Will be
taken into consideration in next version.

> 
> > ---
> > Âdrivers/base/dd.cÂÂÂÂÂÂ| 8 ++++++--
> > Âinclude/linux/device.h | 1 +
> > Â2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > index a641cf3..ac071a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev,
> > struct device_driver *drv)
> > Â	/* If using pinctrl, bind pins now before probing */
> > Â	ret = pinctrl_bind_pins(dev);
> > Â	if (ret)
> > -		goto probe_failed;
> > +		goto pinctrl_bind_failed;
> > Â
> > Â	if (driver_sysfs_add(dev)) {
> > Â		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: driver_sysfs_add(%s)
> > failed\n",
> > @@ -334,6 +334,11 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev,
> > struct device_driver *drv)
> > Â	goto done;
> > Â
> > Âprobe_failed:
> > +	if (dev->bus)
> > +		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dev->bus->p-
> > >bus_notifier,
> > +					ÂÂÂÂÂBUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVE
> > R_ERROR,
> > +					ÂÂÂÂÂdev);
> 
> Well, if we do that, device_bind_driver() needs to send that
> notification too
> in case it doesn't call driver_bound().
> 
> > +pinctrl_bind_failed:
> > Â	devres_release_all(dev);
> > Â	driver_sysfs_remove(dev);
> > Â	dev->driver = NULL;
> > @@ -701,7 +706,6 @@ static void __device_release_driver(struct
> > device *dev)
> > Â			blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dev->bus->p-
> > >bus_notifier,
> > Â						ÂÂÂÂÂBUS_NOTIFY_UN
> > BOUND_DRIVER,
> > Â						ÂÂÂÂÂdev);
> > -
> > Â	}
> > Â}
> > Â
> > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> > index b8f411b..87cf423 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/device.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> > @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ extern int bus_unregister_notifier(struct
> > bus_type *bus,
> > Â						ÂÂÂÂÂÂunbound */
> > Â#define BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER	0x00000007 /* driver is
> > unbound
> > Â						ÂÂÂÂÂÂfrom the
> > device */
> > +#define BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER_ERROR	0x80000004 /* driver
> > fails to be bound */
> 
> I'd call it BUS_NOTIFY_DRIVER_NOT_BOUND.
> 
> > Â
> > Âextern struct kset *bus_get_kset(struct bus_type *bus);
> > Âextern struct klist *bus_get_device_klist(struct bus_type *bus);
> > 
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/