Re: [PATCH v10] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller
From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Fri Nov 27 2015 - 10:33:22 EST
On 27/11/15 15:02, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> Adding PCIe Root Port driver for Xilinx PCIe NWL bridge IP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes for v10:
> -> Changed MSI address to PCIe controller base.
> -> Removed nwl_check_hwirq function, instead using bitmap_find_next_zero_area
> API to do the same.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-nwl-pcie.txt | 68 ++
> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 1068 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 1147 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-nwl-pcie.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d070344
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
[...]
> +#define MSI_ADDRESS 0xFD480000
> +
Really? Why do you bother having DT support then? You might as well
hardcode everything, while you're at it.
/me felling depressed now.
> +struct nwl_msi { /* MSI information */
> + struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
> + unsigned long *bitmap;
> + struct irq_domain *dev_domain;
> + struct mutex lock; /* protect bitmap variable */
> + int irq_msi0;
> + int irq_msi1;
> +};
> +
> +struct nwl_pcie {
> + struct device *dev;
> + void __iomem *breg_base;
> + void __iomem *pcireg_base;
> + void __iomem *ecam_base;
> + u32 phys_breg_base; /* Physical Bridge Register Base */
> + u32 phys_pcie_reg_base; /* Physical PCIe Controller Base */
> + u32 phys_ecam_base; /* Physical Configuration Base */
All these u32 should be phys_addr_t. Not all the world is 32bit,
fortunately.
> + u32 breg_size;
> + u32 pcie_reg_size;
> + u32 ecam_size;
> + int irq_intx;
> + int irq_misc;
> + u32 ecam_value;
> + u8 last_busno;
> + u8 root_busno;
> + u8 link_up;
> + struct nwl_msi msi;
> + struct irq_domain *legacy_irq_domain;
> +};
[...]
> +static void nwl_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t msi_addr = MSI_ADDRESS;
Fix this.
> +
> + msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_addr);
> + msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_addr);
> + msg->data = data->hwirq;
> +}
[...]
> +static int nwl_pcie_bridge_init(struct nwl_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pcie->dev);
> + u32 breg_val, ecam_val, first_busno = 0;
> + int err;
> + int check_link_up = 0;
> +
> + /* Check for BREG present bit */
> + breg_val = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, E_BREG_CAPABILITIES) & BREG_PRESENT;
> + if (!breg_val) {
> + dev_err(pcie->dev, "BREG is not present\n");
> + return breg_val;
> + }
> + /* Write bridge_off to breg base */
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, (u32)(pcie->phys_breg_base),
> + E_BREG_BASE_LO);
> +
I love the casting of a u32 to a u32. You have to program E_BREG_BASE_HI
as well, once you've fixed the data type.
> + /* Enable BREG */
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, ~BREG_ENABLE_FORCE & BREG_ENABLE,
> + E_BREG_CONTROL);
> +
> + /* Disable DMA channel registers */
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, BRCFG_PCIE_RX0) |
> + CFG_DMA_REG_BAR, BRCFG_PCIE_RX0);
> +
> + /* Enable the bridge config interrupt */
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, BRCFG_INTERRUPT) |
> + BRCFG_INTERRUPT_MASK, BRCFG_INTERRUPT);
> + /* Enable Ingress subtractive decode translation */
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, SET_ISUB_CONTROL, I_ISUB_CONTROL);
> +
> + /* Enable msg filtering details */
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, CFG_ENABLE_MSG_FILTER_MASK,
> + BRCFG_PCIE_RX_MSG_FILTER);
> + do {
> + err = nwl_pcie_link_up(pcie, PHY_RDY_LINKUP);
> + if (err != 1) {
> + check_link_up++;
> + if (check_link_up > LINKUP_ITER_CHECK)
> + return -ENODEV;
> + mdelay(1000);
> + }
> + } while (!err);
> +
> + /* Check for ECAM present bit */
> + ecam_val = nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, E_ECAM_CAPABILITIES) & E_ECAM_PRESENT;
> + if (!ecam_val) {
> + dev_err(pcie->dev, "ECAM is not present\n");
> + return ecam_val;
> + }
> +
> + /* Enable ECAM */
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, E_ECAM_CONTROL) |
> + E_ECAM_CR_ENABLE, E_ECAM_CONTROL);
> + /* Write ecam_value on ecam_control */
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, nwl_bridge_readl(pcie, E_ECAM_CONTROL) |
> + (pcie->ecam_value << E_ECAM_SIZE_SHIFT),
> + E_ECAM_CONTROL);
> + /* Write phy_reg_base to ecam base */
> + nwl_bridge_writel(pcie, (u32)pcie->phys_ecam_base, E_ECAM_BASE_LO);
Same here.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/