Re: [PATCH 2/3] ste_dma40: Delete another unnecessary check in d40_probe()

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:24 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:56:07 +0100
>
> A single jump label was used by the d40_probe() function in several cases
> for error handling which was a bit inefficient here.
>
> * This implementation detail could be improved by the introduction
>   of another jump label.
>
> * Remove an extra check for the variable "base".
>
> * Omit its explicit initialisation at the beginning then.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/