Re: [GIT PULL] security: KEYS: Fix handling of stored error in a negatively instantiated user key

From: Josh Boyer
Date: Mon Nov 30 2015 - 08:12:15 EST


On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:41 PM, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Please pull this fix for the keys subsystem, for 4.4, from David Howells.
>
> Note: this oops is triggerable by non-privileged users.
>
> The following changes since commit 6ffeba9607343f15303a399bc402a538800d89d9:
>
> Merge tag 'dm-4.4-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm (2015-11-24 12:53:11 -0800)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git for-linus
>
> David Howells (1):
> KEYS: Fix handling of stored error in a negatively instantiated user key
>
> security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c | 2 ++
> security/keys/trusted.c | 5 ++++-
> security/keys/user_defined.c | 5 ++++-
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> ---
> commit 096fe9eaea40a17e125569f9e657e34cdb6d73bd
> Author: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue Nov 24 21:36:31 2015 +0000
>
> KEYS: Fix handling of stored error in a negatively instantiated user key
>
> If a user key gets negatively instantiated, an error code is cached in the
> payload area. A negatively instantiated key may be then be positively
> instantiated by updating it with valid data. However, the ->update key
> type method must be aware that the error code may be there.
>
> The following may be used to trigger the bug in the user key type:
>
> keyctl request2 user user "" @u
> keyctl add user user "a" @u
>
> which manifests itself as:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000000ffffff8a
> IP: [<ffffffff810a376f>] __call_rcu.constprop.76+0x1f/0x280 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3046
> PGD 7cc30067 PUD 0
> Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 3 PID: 2644 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.3.0+ #49
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> task: ffff88003ddea700 ti: ffff88003dd88000 task.ti: ffff88003dd88000
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810a376f>] [<ffffffff810a376f>] __call_rcu.constprop.76+0x1f/0x280
> [<ffffffff810a376f>] __call_rcu.constprop.76+0x1f/0x280 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3046
> RSP: 0018:ffff88003dd8bdb0 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 00000000ffffff82 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000001
> RDX: ffffffff81e3fe40 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffff82
> RBP: ffff88003dd8bde0 R08: ffff88007d2d2da0 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff88003e8073c0 R12: 00000000ffffff82
> R13: ffff88003dd8be68 R14: ffff88007d027600 R15: ffff88003ddea700
> FS: 0000000000b92880(0063) GS:ffff88007fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 00000000ffffff8a CR3: 000000007cc5f000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Stack:
> ffff88003dd8bdf0 ffffffff81160a8a 0000000000000000 00000000ffffff82
> ffff88003dd8be68 ffff88007d027600 ffff88003dd8bdf0 ffffffff810a39e5
> ffff88003dd8be20 ffffffff812a31ab ffff88007d027600 ffff88007d027620
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff810a39e5>] kfree_call_rcu+0x15/0x20 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3136
> [<ffffffff812a31ab>] user_update+0x8b/0xb0 security/keys/user_defined.c:129
> [< inline >] __key_update security/keys/key.c:730
> [<ffffffff8129e5c1>] key_create_or_update+0x291/0x440 security/keys/key.c:908
> [< inline >] SYSC_add_key security/keys/keyctl.c:125
> [<ffffffff8129fc21>] SyS_add_key+0x101/0x1e0 security/keys/keyctl.c:60
> [<ffffffff8185f617>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:185
>
> Note the error code (-ENOKEY) in EDX.
>
> A similar bug can be tripped by:
>
> keyctl request2 trusted user "" @u
> keyctl add trusted user "a" @u
>
> This should also affect encrypted keys - but that has to be correctly
> parameterised or it will fail with EINVAL before getting to the bit that
> will crashes.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@xxxxxxxxxx>

This should probably be sent to stable, yes?

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/