Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm_tis: Clean up the force=1 module parameter

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:58:29AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The TPM core has long assumed that every device has a driver attached,
> however commit b8b2c7d845d5 ("base/platform: assert that dev_pm_domain
> callbacks are called unconditionally") breaks that assumption.

you asked for an alternative wording here. What about:

	The TPM core has long assumed that every device has a driver
	attached, which is not valid. This was noticed with commit
	b8b2c7d845d5 ("base/platform: assert that dev_pm_domain
	callbacks are called unconditionally") which made probing of the
	tpm_tis device fail by mistake and resulted in an oops later on.
	
?

> Rework the TPM setup to create a platform device with resources and
> then allow the driver core to naturally bind and probe it through the
> normal mechanisms. All this structure is needed anyhow to enable TPM
> for OF environments.
> 
> Finally, since the entire flow is changing convert the init/exit to use
> the modern ifdef-less coding style when possible
> 
> Reported-by: "Wilck, Martin" <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/