Re: [PATCH 1/7] trace/events: Add gup trace events

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 16:07:44 -0800
"Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 12/1/2015 3:56 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue,  1 Dec 2015 15:06:11 -0800
> > Yang Shi <yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  
> >> page-faults events record the invoke to handle_mm_fault, but the invoke
> >> may come from do_page_fault or gup. In some use cases, the finer event count
> >> mey be needed, so add trace events support for:
> >>
> >> __get_user_pages
> >> __get_user_pages_fast
> >> fixup_user_fault
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   include/trace/events/gup.h | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 include/trace/events/gup.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/trace/events/gup.h b/include/trace/events/gup.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..37d18f9
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/include/trace/events/gup.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> >> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> >> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM gup
> >> +
> >> +#if !defined(_TRACE_GUP_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> >> +#define _TRACE_GUP_H
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> >> +
> >> +TRACE_EVENT(gup_fixup_user_fault,
> >> +
> >> +	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> >> +			unsigned long address, unsigned int fault_flags),
> >> +
> >> +	TP_ARGS(tsk, mm, address, fault_flags),
> >> +
> >> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> >> +		__array(	char,	comm,	TASK_COMM_LEN	)  
> >
> > Why save the comm? The tracing infrastructure should keep track of that.  
> 
> The code is referred to kmem.h which has comm copied. If it is 
> unnecessary, it definitely could be removed.

Sometimes comm isn't that reliable. But really, the only tracepoint
that should record it is sched_switch, and sched_wakeup. With those
two, the rest of the trace points should be fine.

> 
> >  
> >> +		__field(	unsigned long,	address		)
> >> +	),
> >> +
> >> +	TP_fast_assign(
> >> +		memcpy(__entry->comm, tsk->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> >> +		__entry->address	= address;
> >> +	),
> >> +
> >> +	TP_printk("comm=%s address=%lx", __entry->comm, __entry->address)
> >> +);
> >> +
> >> +TRACE_EVENT(gup_get_user_pages,
> >> +
> >> +	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> >> +			unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> >> +			unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages,
> >> +			struct vm_area_struct **vmas, int *nonblocking),
> >> +
> >> +	TP_ARGS(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, gup_flags, pages, vmas, nonblocking),  
> >
> > Why so many arguments? Most are not used.  
> 
> My understanding to TP_ARGS may be not right. Doesn't it require all the 
> args defined by the function? If not, it could definitely be shrunk. 
> Just need keep the args used by TP_printk?

It only needs what is used by TP_fast_assign().

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/