Re: [PATCH 3/6] net: thunderx: Increase transmit queue length
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed Dec 02 2015 - 08:25:40 EST
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 11:18 +0530, Sunil Kovvuri wrote:
> >The driver should successfully recover from out of memory situations
> > and not stop RX/TX completely.
> This memory allocation is while interface bringup/initialization and not during
> packet I/O.
>
> >Don't put this off as not "related" to your patch, it is as this
> >introduces the behavior for this user, and you should fix it before
> >expecting me to apply this patch series.
> I would disagree on this, as this patch hasn't introduced any failure here,
> if this user has connected any device which asks for a bit large amount
> of coherent memory then i am sure he will see the same issue.
> And above i have suggested what could be done to not see this issue.
This is unacceptable.
Maybe you did not complete tests. changelog has no 'Tested:' section.
You can not claim this patch was good, especially considering no precise
numbers were given.
If the performance increase is 4 %, then surely using twice more memory
is not worth it.
RX/TX ring buffer sizes should be :
- Default to reasonable sizes (ie not gigantic memory usage for typical
use). For multiqueue devices, one also has to take into account the
number of queues:
If a 10Gbit NIC has 128 queues, then probably having 8192 slots
per queue is too much, if this maps to 512 MB of memory !
- ethtool -G support to let the admin change the conservative settings
for the exceptional workloads.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/