Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Remove use of control list and ops

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:50:32 +0100
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:27:00AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:58:26 +0100
> > Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:56:55AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > 
> > > SNIP
> > >   
> > > > -static void ftrace_ops_recurs_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> > > > +static void ftrace_ops_assist_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> > > >  				   struct ftrace_ops *op, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	int bit;
> > > >  
> > > > +	if ((op->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_RCU) && !rcu_is_watching())
> > > > +		return;
> > > > +
> > > >  	bit = trace_test_and_set_recursion(TRACE_LIST_START, TRACE_LIST_MAX);
> > > >  	if (bit < 0)
> > > >  		return;
> > > >  
> > > > -	op->func(ip, parent_ip, op, regs);
> > > > +	preempt_disable_notrace();
> > > >  
> > > > +	if (!(op->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_PER_CPU) ||
> > > > +	    ftrace_function_local_disabled(op)) {    
> > > 
> > > should be !ftrace_function_local_disabled(op) in here,
> > > I passed my test with attached patch
> > >   
> > 
> > Can you retest with this patch:  
> 
> sure, but other than the declaration removal it's the same change
> 

Yep, but I'm paranoid :-) Any change I like to get retested. But if
you're fine, can I get a 'Tested-by' from you?

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/