Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, printk: introduce new format string for flags

[Vlastimil Babka]

On 12/02/2015 06:40 PM, yalin wang wrote:

(please trim your reply next time, no need to quote whole patch here)

> i am thinking why not make %pg* to be more generic ?
> not restricted to only GFP / vma flags / page flags .
> so could we change format like this ?
> define a flag spec struct to include flag and trace_print_flags and some other option :
> typedef struct { 
> unsigned long flag;
> struct trace_print_flags *flags;
> unsigned long option; } flag_sec;
> flag_sec my_flag;
> in printk we only pass like this :
> printk(â%pg\nâ, &my_flag) ;
> then it can print any flags defined by user .
> more useful for other drivers to use .

I don't know, it sounds quite complicated given that we had no flags printing
for years and now there's just three kinds of them. The extra struct flag_sec is
IMHO nuissance. No other printk format needs such thing AFAIK? For example, if I
were to print page flags from several places, each would have to define the
struct flag_sec instance, or some header would have to provide it?

I could maybe accept passing a flag value and trace_print_flags * as two
separate parameters, but I guess that breaks an ancient invariant of one
parameter per format string...

> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/