[PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 66/86] KVM: x86: work around infinite loop in microcode when #AC is delivered
From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Wed Dec 02 2015 - 18:06:27 EST
3.13.11-ckt31 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Northup <digitaleric@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 54a20552e1eae07aa240fa370a0293e006b5faed upstream.
It was found that a guest can DoS a host by triggering an infinite
stream of "alignment check" (#AC) exceptions. This causes the
microcode to enter an infinite loop where the core never receives
another interrupt. The host kernel panics pretty quickly due to the
effects (CVE-2015-5307).
Signed-off-by: Eric Northup <digitaleric@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 8 ++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 5 ++++-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
index b5d7640..8a4add8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@
{ SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + UD_VECTOR, "UD excp" }, \
{ SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + PF_VECTOR, "PF excp" }, \
{ SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + NM_VECTOR, "NM excp" }, \
+ { SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + AC_VECTOR, "AC excp" }, \
{ SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + MC_VECTOR, "MC excp" }, \
{ SVM_EXIT_INTR, "interrupt" }, \
{ SVM_EXIT_NMI, "nmi" }, \
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index fa8296f..fe3f4b8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1103,6 +1103,7 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
set_exception_intercept(svm, PF_VECTOR);
set_exception_intercept(svm, UD_VECTOR);
set_exception_intercept(svm, MC_VECTOR);
+ set_exception_intercept(svm, AC_VECTOR);
set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_INTR);
set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_NMI);
@@ -1765,6 +1766,12 @@ static int ud_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
return 1;
}
+static int ac_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
+{
+ kvm_queue_exception_e(&svm->vcpu, AC_VECTOR, 0);
+ return 1;
+}
+
static void svm_fpu_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
@@ -3281,6 +3288,7 @@ static int (*const svm_exit_handlers[])(struct vcpu_svm *svm) = {
[SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + PF_VECTOR] = pf_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + NM_VECTOR] = nm_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + MC_VECTOR] = mc_interception,
+ [SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + AC_VECTOR] = ac_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_INTR] = intr_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_NMI] = nmi_interception,
[SVM_EXIT_SMI] = nop_on_interception,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 4b7094e..380ba0c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ static void update_exception_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u32 eb;
eb = (1u << PF_VECTOR) | (1u << UD_VECTOR) | (1u << MC_VECTOR) |
- (1u << NM_VECTOR) | (1u << DB_VECTOR);
+ (1u << NM_VECTOR) | (1u << DB_VECTOR) | (1u << AC_VECTOR);
if ((vcpu->guest_debug &
(KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP)) ==
(KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP))
@@ -4823,6 +4823,9 @@ static int handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return handle_rmode_exception(vcpu, ex_no, error_code);
switch (ex_no) {
+ case AC_VECTOR:
+ kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, AC_VECTOR, error_code);
+ return 1;
case DB_VECTOR:
dr6 = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
if (!(vcpu->guest_debug &
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/