Re: memcg uncharge page counter mismatch
From: Minchan Kim
Date: Wed Dec 02 2015 - 21:09:57 EST
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:34:04AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:16:43AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 01-12-15 22:34:55, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > With new test on mmotm-2015-11-25-17-08, I saw below WARNING message
> > > several times. I couldn't see it with reverting new THP refcount
> > > redesign.
> >
> > Just a wild guess. What prevents migration/compaction from calling
> > split_huge_page on thp zero page? There is VM_BUG_ON but it is not clear
>
> I guess migration should work with LRU pages now but zero page couldn't
> stay there.
>
> > whether you run with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled.
>
> I enabled VM_DEBUG_VM.
>
> >
> > Also, how big is the underflow?
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_counter.c b/mm/page_counter.c
> index 7c6a63d..adc27c3 100644
> --- a/mm/page_counter.c
> +++ b/mm/page_counter.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ void page_counter_cancel(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages)
>
> new = atomic_long_sub_return(nr_pages, &counter->count);
> /* More uncharges than charges? */
> + if (new < 0)
> + printk("nr_pages %lu new %ld\n", nr_pages, new);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(new < 0);
> }
>
> nr_pages 512 new -31
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1145 at mm/page_counter.c:28 page_counter_cancel+0x44/0x50()
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 3 PID: 1145 Comm: madvise_test Not tainted 4.4.0-rc2-mm1-kirill+ #17
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> ffffffff81782f09 ffff8800598c3b90 ffffffff8126f476 0000000000000000
> ffff8800598c3bc8 ffffffff8103e476 ffff88007f14f8b0 0000000000000200
> 0000000000000000 0000000000000200 ffff88007f14f800 ffff8800598c3bd8
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8126f476>] dump_stack+0x44/0x5e
> [<ffffffff8103e476>] warn_slowpath_common+0x86/0xc0
> [<ffffffff8103e56a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [<ffffffff8114c744>] page_counter_cancel+0x44/0x50
> [<ffffffff8114c842>] page_counter_uncharge+0x22/0x30
> [<ffffffff8114fe07>] uncharge_batch+0x47/0x140
> [<ffffffff81150023>] uncharge_list+0x123/0x190
> [<ffffffff811521f9>] mem_cgroup_uncharge+0x29/0x30
> [<ffffffff810fe3be>] __page_cache_release+0x15e/0x200
> [<ffffffff810fe47e>] __put_compound_page+0x1e/0x50
> [<ffffffff810fe960>] release_pages+0xd0/0x370
> [<ffffffff8113042d>] free_pages_and_swap_cache+0x9d/0x120
> [<ffffffff8111a516>] tlb_flush_mmu_free+0x36/0x60
> [<ffffffff8111b60c>] tlb_finish_mmu+0x1c/0x50
> [<ffffffff81125f1c>] exit_mmap+0xec/0x140
> [<ffffffff8103bd56>] mmput+0x56/0xe0
> [<ffffffff8103ff4d>] do_exit+0x1fd/0xaa0
> [<ffffffff8104086f>] do_group_exit+0x3f/0xb0
> [<ffffffff810408f4>] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
> [<ffffffff8142b617>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
> ---[ end trace 872ed93351e964c0 ]---
> nr_pages 293 new -324
> nr_pages 16 new -340
> nr_pages 342 new -91
> nr_pages 246 new -337
> nr_pages 15 new -352
> nr_pages 15 new -367
My guess is that it's related to new feature of Kirill's THP 'PageDoubleMap'
so a THP page could be mapped a pte but !pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) so memcg
precharge in move_charge should handle it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/