[PATCH v2 2/3] perf hists browser: Add NULL pointer check to prevent crash
From: Wang Nan
Date: Wed Dec 02 2015 - 22:09:15 EST
Before this patch we can trigger a segfault by following steps:
Step 0: Use 'perf record' to generate a perf.data without callchain
Step 1: perf report
Step 2: Use UP/DOWN to select an entry, don't press 'ENTER'
Step 3: Use '/' to filter symbols, use a filter which returns
empty result
Step 4: Press 'ENTER' (notice here that the old selection is still
there. This is another problem)
Step 5: Press 'ENTER' to annotate that symbol
Step 6: Press 'LEFT' to go out.
Result: segfault:
perf: Segmentation fault
-------- backtrace --------
/home/wangnan/perf[0x53e568]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x3545f)[0x7fba75d3245f]
/home/wangnan/perf[0x537516]
/home/wangnan/perf[0x533fef]
/home/wangnan/perf[0x53b347]
/home/wangnan/perf(perf_evlist__tui_browse_hists+0x96)[0x53d206]
/home/wangnan/perf(cmd_report+0x1b9f)[0x442c7f]
/home/wangnan/perf[0x47efa2]
/home/wangnan/perf(main+0x5f5)[0x432fa5]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x7fba75d1ebd4]
/home/wangnan/perf[0x4330d4]
This is because in this case 'nd' could be NULL in
ui_browser__hists_seek(), but that function never check it.
This patch adds checker for potential NULL pointer in that function.
After this patch the above steps won't segfault again.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
index 601a585..7447515 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
@@ -1297,6 +1297,9 @@ static void ui_browser__hists_seek(struct ui_browser *browser,
* and stop when we printed enough lines to fill the screen.
*/
do_offset:
+
+ if (!nd)
+ return;
if (offset > 0) {
do {
h = rb_entry(nd, struct hist_entry, rb_node);
--
1.8.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/