Re: [PATCH] mm/vmstat: retrieve more accurate vmstat value

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:52:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:04:44AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Although vmstat values aren't designed for accuracy, these are already
> > > used by some sensitive places so it is better to be more accurate.
> > 
> > The design is to sacrifice accuracy and the time the updates occur for
> > performance reasons. This is not the purpose the counters were designed
> > for. If you put these demands on the vmstat then you will get complex
> > convoluted code and compromise performance.
> 
> I understand design decision, but, it is better to get value as much
> as accurate if there is no performance problem. My patch would not
> cause much performance degradation because it is just adding one
> this_cpu_read().
> 
> Consider about following example. Current implementation returns
> interesting output if someone do following things.
> 
> v1 = zone_page_state(XXX);
> mod_zone_page_state(XXX, 1);
> v2 = zone_page_state(XXX);
> 
> v2 would be same with v1 in most of cases even if we already update
> it.
> 
> This situation could occurs in page allocation path and others. If
> some task try to allocate many pages, then watermark check returns
> same values until updating vmstat even if some freepage are allocated.
> There are some adjustments for this imprecision but why not do it become
> accurate? I think that this change is reasonable trade-off.
> 
Christoph, any comment?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/