Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: implement lockup detector

From: Don Zickus
Date: Thu Dec 03 2015 - 12:50:37 EST


On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:28:39PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Workqueue stalls can happen from a variety of usage bugs such as
> missing WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag or concurrency managed work item
> indefinitely staying RUNNING. These stalls can be extremely difficult
> to hunt down because the usual warning mechanisms can't detect
> workqueue stalls and the internal state is pretty opaque.
>
> To alleviate the situation, this patch implements workqueue lockup
> detector. It periodically monitors all worker_pools periodically and,
> if any pool failed to make forward progress longer than the threshold
> duration, triggers warning and dumps workqueue state as follows.

This sort of looks like the hung task detector..

I am a little concerned because we just made a big effort to properly
separate the hardlockup and softlockup paths and yet retain the flexibility
to enable/disable them separately. Now it seems the workqueue detector is
permanently entwined with the softlockup detector. I am not entirely sure
that is correct thing to do.

It also seems awkward for the lockup code to have to jump to the workqueue
code to function properly. :-/ Though we have made exceptions for the virt
stuff and the workqueue code is simple..

Actually, I am curious, it seems if you just added a
/proc/sys/kernel/wq_watchdog entry, you could elminiate the entire need for
modifying the watchdog code to begin with. As you really aren't using any
of it other than piggybacking on the touch_softlockup_watchdog stuff, which
could probably be easily added without all the extra enable/disable changes
in watchdog.c.

Again, this looks like what the hung task detector is doing, which I
struggled with years ago to integrate with the lockup code because in the
end I had trouble re-using much of it.

Thoughts?

Cheers,
Don

>
> BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 31s!
> Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
> workqueue events: flags=0x0
> pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=17/256
> pending: monkey_wrench_fn, e1000_watchdog, cache_reap, vmstat_shepherd, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, release_one_tty, cgroup_release_agent
> workqueue events_power_efficient: flags=0x80
> pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=2/256
> pending: check_lifetime, neigh_periodic_work
> workqueue cgroup_pidlist_destroy: flags=0x0
> pwq 0: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/1
> pending: cgroup_pidlist_destroy_work_fn
> ...
>
> The detection mechanism is enabled/disabled together with scheduler
> softlockup watchdog and uses the same threshold value; however, it
> currently doesn't trigger panic. We can do that later once the
> detection mechanism proves to be reliable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 1
> include/linux/workqueue.h | 6 +
> kernel/watchdog.c | 15 +++-
> kernel/workqueue.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sc
> extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void);
> extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void);
> extern void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void);
> +extern int get_softlockup_thresh(void);
> extern int proc_dowatchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> void __user *buffer,
> size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
> +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
> @@ -618,4 +618,10 @@ static inline int workqueue_sysfs_regist
> { return 0; }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR
> +void enable_workqueue_watchdog(void);
> +void disable_workqueue_watchdog(void);
> +void touch_workqueue_watchdog(int cpu);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR */
> +
> #endif
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/smpboot.h>
> #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
> #include <linux/tick.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> @@ -192,7 +193,7 @@ __setup("hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace=",
> * the thresholds with a factor: we make the soft threshold twice the amount of
> * time the hard threshold is.
> */
> -static int get_softlockup_thresh(void)
> +int get_softlockup_thresh(void)
> {
> return watchdog_thresh * 2;
> }
> @@ -245,6 +246,7 @@ void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sched(voi
> void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
> {
> touch_softlockup_watchdog_sched();
> + touch_workqueue_watchdog(raw_smp_processor_id());
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
>
> @@ -259,6 +261,7 @@ void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void
> */
> for_each_watchdog_cpu(cpu)
> per_cpu(watchdog_touch_ts, cpu) = 0;
> + touch_workqueue_watchdog(-1);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> @@ -795,13 +798,18 @@ static int watchdog_enable_all_cpus(void
> {
> int err = 0;
>
> + disable_workqueue_watchdog();
> +
> if (!watchdog_running) {
> err = smpboot_register_percpu_thread_cpumask(&watchdog_threads,
> &watchdog_cpumask);
> - if (err)
> + if (err) {
> pr_err("Failed to create watchdog threads, disabled\n");
> - else
> + } else {
> + if (watchdog_enabled & SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED)
> + enable_workqueue_watchdog();
> watchdog_running = 1;
> + }
> } else {
> /*
> * Enable/disable the lockup detectors or
> @@ -826,6 +834,7 @@ static void watchdog_disable_all_cpus(vo
> if (watchdog_running) {
> watchdog_running = 0;
> smpboot_unregister_percpu_thread(&watchdog_threads);
> + disable_workqueue_watchdog();
> }
> }
>
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct worker_pool {
> int id; /* I: pool ID */
> unsigned int flags; /* X: flags */
>
> + unsigned long watchdog_ts; /* L: watchdog timestamp */
> +
> struct list_head worklist; /* L: list of pending works */
> int nr_workers; /* L: total number of workers */
>
> @@ -1083,6 +1085,8 @@ static void pwq_activate_delayed_work(st
> struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
>
> trace_workqueue_activate_work(work);
> + if (list_empty(&pwq->pool->worklist))
> + pwq->pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
> move_linked_works(work, &pwq->pool->worklist, NULL);
> __clear_bit(WORK_STRUCT_DELAYED_BIT, work_data_bits(work));
> pwq->nr_active++;
> @@ -1385,6 +1389,8 @@ retry:
> trace_workqueue_activate_work(work);
> pwq->nr_active++;
> worklist = &pwq->pool->worklist;
> + if (list_empty(worklist))
> + pwq->pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
> } else {
> work_flags |= WORK_STRUCT_DELAYED;
> worklist = &pwq->delayed_works;
> @@ -2157,6 +2163,8 @@ recheck:
> list_first_entry(&pool->worklist,
> struct work_struct, entry);
>
> + pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
> +
> if (likely(!(*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_LINKED))) {
> /* optimization path, not strictly necessary */
> process_one_work(worker, work);
> @@ -2240,6 +2248,7 @@ repeat:
> struct pool_workqueue, mayday_node);
> struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool;
> struct work_struct *work, *n;
> + bool first = true;
>
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> list_del_init(&pwq->mayday_node);
> @@ -2256,9 +2265,14 @@ repeat:
> * process'em.
> */
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(scheduled));
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(work, n, &pool->worklist, entry)
> - if (get_work_pwq(work) == pwq)
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(work, n, &pool->worklist, entry) {
> + if (get_work_pwq(work) == pwq) {
> + if (first)
> + pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
> move_linked_works(work, scheduled, &n);
> + }
> + first = false;
> + }
>
> if (!list_empty(scheduled)) {
> process_scheduled_works(rescuer);
> @@ -3069,6 +3083,7 @@ static int init_worker_pool(struct worke
> pool->cpu = -1;
> pool->node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
> + pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->worklist);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->idle_list);
> hash_init(pool->busy_hash);
> @@ -4308,7 +4323,9 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void)
>
> pr_info("pool %d:", pool->id);
> pr_cont_pool_info(pool);
> - pr_cont(" workers=%d", pool->nr_workers);
> + pr_cont(" hung=%us workers=%d",
> + jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - pool->watchdog_ts) / 1000,
> + pool->nr_workers);
> if (pool->manager)
> pr_cont(" manager: %d",
> task_pid_nr(pool->manager->task));
> @@ -5167,6 +5184,129 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(s
> static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq) { }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
>
> +/*
> + * Workqueue watchdog.
> + *
> + * Stall may be caused by various bugs - missing WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, illegal
> + * flush dependency, a concurrency managed work item which stays RUNNING
> + * indefinitely. Workqueue stalls can be very difficult to debug as the
> + * usual warning mechanisms don't trigger and internal workqueue state is
> + * largely opaque.
> + *
> + * Workqueue watchdog monitors all worker pools periodically and dumps
> + * state if some pools failed to make forward progress for a while where
> + * forward progress is defined as the first item on ->worklist changing.
> + *
> + * The mechanism is enabled and disabled together with softlockup watchdog
> + * and uses the same threshold duration; however, it currently doesn't
> + * cause panic even if softlockup_panic is set. Also, workqueue watchdog
> + * assumes that the usual jiffies and timer mechanisms are working as there
> + * isn't much point in warning about workqueue stalls when timer is broken.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR
> +
> +static void wq_watchdog_timer_fn(unsigned long data);
> +
> +static unsigned long wq_watchdog_thresh;
> +static struct timer_list wq_watchdog_timer =
> + TIMER_DEFERRED_INITIALIZER(wq_watchdog_timer_fn, 0, 0);
> +
> +static unsigned long wq_watchdog_touched = INITIAL_JIFFIES;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, wq_watchdog_touched_cpu) = INITIAL_JIFFIES;
> +
> +static void wq_watchdog_reset_touched(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + wq_watchdog_touched = jiffies;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + per_cpu(wq_watchdog_touched_cpu, cpu) = jiffies;
> +}
> +
> +static void wq_watchdog_timer_fn(unsigned long data)
> +{
> + unsigned long thresh = wq_watchdog_thresh;
> + bool lockup_detected = false;
> + struct worker_pool *pool;
> + int pi;
> +
> + if (!thresh)
> + return;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
> + unsigned long pool_ts, touched, ts;
> +
> + if (list_empty(&pool->worklist))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* get the latest of pool and touched timestamps */
> + pool_ts = READ_ONCE(pool->watchdog_ts);
> + touched = READ_ONCE(wq_watchdog_touched);
> +
> + if (time_after(pool_ts, touched))
> + ts = pool_ts;
> + else
> + ts = touched;
> +
> + if (pool->cpu >= 0) {
> + unsigned long cpu_touched =
> + READ_ONCE(per_cpu(wq_watchdog_touched_cpu,
> + pool->cpu));
> + if (time_after(cpu_touched, ts))
> + ts = cpu_touched;
> + }
> +
> + /* did we stall? */
> + if (time_after(jiffies, ts + thresh)) {
> + lockup_detected = true;
> + pr_emerg("BUG: workqueue lockup - pool");
> + pr_cont_pool_info(pool);
> + pr_cont(" stuck for %us!\n",
> + jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - pool_ts) / 1000);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + if (lockup_detected)
> + show_workqueue_state();
> +
> + wq_watchdog_reset_touched();
> + mod_timer(&wq_watchdog_timer, jiffies + thresh);
> +}
> +
> +void enable_workqueue_watchdog(void)
> +{
> + wq_watchdog_thresh = get_softlockup_thresh() * HZ;
> +
> + wq_watchdog_reset_touched();
> + mod_timer(&wq_watchdog_timer, jiffies + wq_watchdog_thresh);
> +}
> +
> +void disable_workqueue_watchdog(void)
> +{
> + wq_watchdog_thresh = 0;
> + del_timer_sync(&wq_watchdog_timer);
> +}
> +
> +void touch_workqueue_watchdog(int cpu)
> +{
> + /*
> + * If not explicitly touched, these stamps are never updated, which
> + * means that they may affect stall detection if jiffies wraps;
> + * however, it's highly unlikely and the worst that can happen is
> + * delaying stall detection by upto one threshold duration.
> + */
> + if (cpu >= 0)
> + per_cpu(wq_watchdog_touched_cpu, cpu) = jiffies;
> + else
> + wq_watchdog_touched = jiffies;
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR */
> +
> static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
> {
> cpumask_var_t *tbl;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/