Re: [PATCH] workqueue: warn if memory reclaim tries to flush !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:56:32PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> So, if I'm not mistaken, those are all marking tasks which can be
> depended upon during memory reclaim and we do want to catch them all.

Up to a point yes, these are things that want to be reliable during
reclaim, but lacking memory reserves and usage bounds (which we
discussed last at lsf/mm) these are just wanna-be.

> PF_MEMALLOC shouldn't depend on something which require memory to be
> reclaimed to guarantee forward progress.

PF_MEMALLOC basically avoids reclaim for any memory allocation while its
set.

The thing is, even if your workqueue has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set, it will not
hit the mayday button until you're completely full flat out of memory.
At which point you're probably boned anyway, because, as per the above,
all that code assumes there's _some_ memory to be had.

One solution is to always fail maybe_create_worker() when PF_MEMALLOC is
set, thus always hitting the mayday button.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/