Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add online file check feature
From: Gang He
Date: Fri Dec 04 2015 - 03:36:50 EST
Hi Greg,
>>>
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:05:27PM -0700, Gang He wrote:
>> Hello Pavel,
>>
>>
>>
>> >>>
>> > On Wed 2015-10-28 14:25:57, Gang He wrote:
>> >> When there are errors in the ocfs2 filesystem,
>> >> they are usually accompanied by the inode number which caused the error.
>> >> This inode number would be the input to fixing the file.
>> >> One of these options could be considered:
>> >> A file in the sys filesytem which would accept inode numbers.
>> >> This could be used to communication back what has to be fixed or is fixed.
>> >> You could write:
>> >> $# echo "CHECK <inode>" > /sys/fs/ocfs2/devname/filecheck
>> >> or
>> >> $# echo "FIX <inode>" > /sys/fs/ocfs2/devname/filecheck
>> >>
>> >
>> > Are you sure this is reasonable interface? I mean.... sysfs is
>> > supposed to be one value per file. And I don't think its suitable for
>> > running commands.
>> Usually, the corrupted file (inode) should be rarely encountered for OCFS2
> file system, then
>> lots of commands are executed via this interface with high performance is
> not expected by us.
>> Second, after online file check is added, we also plan to add a mount option
> "error=fix", that means
>> the file system can fix these errors automatically without a manual command
> triggering.
>
> It's not a "performance" issue, it's a "sysfs files only have one value"
> type thing. Have two files, "inode_fix" and "inode_check" and then just
> write the inode into them, no need to have a "verb <inode>" type parser.
Current, we have three functional items "check, fix and set", in the future, maybe we can add more item.
Then, for each functional item, we need to create a sys file and add related code (actual some code is duplicated),
I prefer to one sys file to handle multiple sub-commands.
Thanks
Gang
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/