On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 09:20 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
Hi Bayi, Matthias,
Sorry for the late review, one comment below...
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Bayi Cheng <bayi.cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add Mediatek nor flash node
Signed-off-by: Bayi Cheng <bayi.cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
index 4dd5f93..7988656 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
@@ -387,7 +387,23 @@
status = "disabled";
};
- i2c3: i2c@11010000 {
+ nor_flash: spi@1100d000 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-nor";
+ reg = <0 0x1100d000 0 0xe0>;
+ clocks = <&pericfg CLK_PERI_SPI>,
+ <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SPINFI_IFR_SEL>;
+ clock-names = "spi", "sf";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ status = "disabled";
+
+ flash@0 {
+ compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
+ reg = <0>;
+ };
I think this flash@0 node represents the flash device present on the
board and should therefore be moved to the board-specific .dts.
-Dan
Hi Daniel, Thanks for your comments, and I will fixed it in the next
patch.
--+ };
+
+ i2c3: i2c3@11010000 {
compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-i2c";
reg = <0 0x11010000 0 0x70>,
<0 0x11000280 0 0x80>;
--
1.8.1.1.dirty