Re: [PATCH V7 2/3] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver

[Vinod Koul]

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:57:34PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 11/30/2015 10:17 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:42:01AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > 
> >>>> +static int hidma_mgmt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	struct hidma_mgmt_dev *mgmtdev;
> >>>> +	struct resource *res;
> >>>> +	void __iomem *virtaddr;
> >>>> +	int irq;
> >>>> +	int rc;
> >>>> +	u32 val;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, AUTOSUSPEND_TIMEOUT);
> >>>> +	pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> >>>> +	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
> >>>> +	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> >>>
> >>> at this time pm core will treat device as fully enabled and pm methods can
> >>> be invoked, but you are not ready yet right. Typically these are done at the
> >>> end of the probe unless you have a reason... 
> >>
> >> I need it here because the clocks are declared as ACPI power resources.
> >> The kernel is turning off all power resources during initialization. In
> >> order for this code to touch the hardware, I need to call enable so that
> >> clocks are enabled once again.
> > 
> > The question is are you ready in your driver routines to be invoked by pm
> > core?
> > 
> 
> I don't have any support for suspend and resume PM APIs. The only PM
> interface I support is PM runtime. PM can turn on/off the clocks based
> on the reference counts it maintains after get/set APIs. Since PM is
> turning off the clocks during power up before my driver load, I do need
> to grab this lock to re-enable it during HW initialization. Then, let PM
> turn off the clocks again after the AUTOSUSPEND_TIMEOUT when I'm done.
> 
> Is there any other interaction with the PM that I'm not aware of?

No this is fine. The the runtime_resume will be onvoked and it will request
resources are those set before you enable the device?

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/