Re: crypto/nx842: Ignore queue overflow informative error
From: Daniel Axtens
Date: Sun Dec 06 2015 - 17:57:33 EST
Haren Myneni <haren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> NX842 coprocessor sets bit 3 if queue is overflow. It is just for
> information to the user. So the driver prints this informative message
> and ignores it.
What queue, and what happens when the queue overflows? It seems like
*something* would need to be done, somewhere, by someone?
I realise that as a piece of IBM hardware this is probably an incredibly
optimistic question, but is this behaviour documented publically anywhere?
(As a distant second best, is it documented internally anywhere that I
can read?)
> --- a/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-842-powernv.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/nx/nx-842-powernv.c
> @@ -442,6 +442,15 @@ static int nx842_powernv_function(const unsigned char *in, unsigned int inlen,
> (unsigned int)ccw,
> (unsigned int)be32_to_cpu(crb->ccw));
>
> + /*
> + * NX842 coprocessor uses 3rd bit to report queue overflow which is
> + * not an error, just for information to user. So, ignore this bit.
> + */
> + if (ret & ICSWX_BIT3) {
> + pr_info_ratelimited("842 coprocessor queue overflow\n");
It doesn't look like this is done anywhere else in the file, but should
this be prefixed with something? Something like "nx-842: Coprocessor
queue overflow"?
Regards,
Daniel
> + ret &= ~ICSWX_BIT3;
> + }
> +
> switch (ret) {
> case ICSWX_INITIATED:
> ret = wait_for_csb(wmem, csb);
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature