Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices

[Archit Taneja]

On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > Hi Archit,
> > >
> > > [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3]
> > > [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127]
> > >
> > > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725
> > > config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config)
> > > reproduce:
> > >           # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > >           make ARCH=x86_64
> > >
> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > >      drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add':
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >        if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {
> >
> > Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI
> > depend on CONFIG_OF?
>
> Please don't.

Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices
until now was via DT?

Archit

> BR,
> Jani.

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/