On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Archit,
[auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3]
[also build test ERROR on: next-20151127]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725
config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add':
if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI
depend on CONFIG_OF?
Please don't.
Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices
until now was via DT?
Oh, you want the gory details... we use the DSI code as a library for
abstraction and helpers, without actually creating or registering the
devices.
BR,
Jani.
Archit
BR,
Jani.