Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] clk: bcm2835: Add PWM clock support to the device tree

[Eric Anholt]

Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Remi,
>
> Am 07.12.2015 um 19:17 schrieb Remi Pommarel:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 10:16:25PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>> Hi Remi,
>>>
>>> please send this patch to devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Ok, just to be sure I understand the process here. I should resend a new
>> version of the whole patchset including the devicetree mailing list as
>> recipent. Then the first 3 patches will eventually get pushed by a clock
>> subsystem maintainer. And finally this last patch will be pushed by a
>> devicetree maintainer.
>>
>> Am I right here ?
>
> sorry for the confusion. I mean that you send a copy to 
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx so subscribers have a chance to review.
>
> I'm not sure but according to your subject you suggest that this dts 
> patch should go through clock subsystem which isn't optimal. This should 
> be better applied by Stephen or Eric.

It would be applied by me, but that's for me to worry about, not the
patch submitter.  The subject prefix would be "ARM: bcm2835: ", but
that's trivial for me to fix when applying, not the kind of thing worth
asking for a respin for.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature