Re: use-after-free in __perf_install_in_context

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:56:23PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 05:12:04PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Alexei Starovoitov
> >> <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:09:21PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >> >> > So it would be _awesome_ if we could somehow extend this callchain to
> >> >> > include the site that calls call_rcu().
> >> >>
> >> >> We have a patch for KASAN in works that adds so-called stack depot
> >> >> which allows to map a stack trace onto uint32 id. Then we can plumb
> >> >
> >> > I was hacking something similar to categorize stack traces with u32 id.
> >> > How are you planning to limit the number of such stack traces ?
> >> > and what is the interface for user space to get stack trace from an id?
> >>
> >>
> >> We don't limit number of stack traces. Kernel does not seem to use
> >> data-driven recursion extensively, so there is limited number of
> >> stacks. Though, probably we will need to strip non-interrupt part for
> >> interrupt stacks, otherwise that can produce unbounded number of
> >> different stacks.
> >> There is no interface for user-space, it is used only inside of kernel
> >> to save stacks for memory blocks (rcu callbacks, thread pool items in
> >> the future).
> >> The design is based on what we successfully and extensively use in
> >> user-space sanitizers for years. Current code is here:
> >> https://github.com/ramosian-glider/kasan/commit/fb0eefd212366401ed5ad244233ef379a27bfb46
> >
> > why did you pick approach to never free accumulated stacks?
> > That limits usability a lot, since once kasan starts using it only
> > reboot will free the memory. ouch.
> > what worked for user space doesn't work for kernel.
> 
> 
> Freeing and reusing will slow down and complicate code significantly.
> And it is not yet proved to be necessary.

It's a joke, right? allocating kernel pages without ability to free?!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/