Re: [PATCH 23/34] x86, pkeys: add Kconfig prompt to existing config option

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion on whether we need this or not.
> Protection Keys has relatively little code associated with it,
> and it is not a heavyweight feature to keep enabled.  However,
> I can imagine that folks would still appreciate being able to
> disable it.

The tiny kernel folks are happy about every few kB which are NOT
added by default.
 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> 
>  b/arch/x86/Kconfig |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff -puN arch/x86/Kconfig~pkeys-40-kconfig-prompt arch/x86/Kconfig
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig~pkeys-40-kconfig-prompt	2015-12-03 16:21:28.726811905 -0800
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig	2015-12-03 16:21:28.730812086 -0800
> @@ -1682,8 +1682,18 @@ config X86_INTEL_MPX
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
>  config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> +	prompt "Intel Memory Protection Keys"
>  	def_bool y
> +	# Note: only available in 64-bit mode
>  	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_64
> +	---help---
> +	  Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing
> +	  page-based protections, but without requiring modification of the
> +	  page tables when an application changes protection domains.
> +
> +	  For details, see Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
> +
> +	  If unsure, say y.
>  
>  config EFI
>  	bool "EFI runtime service support"
> _
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/