Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation

[Herbert Xu]

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:36:32AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> 
> Without knowing your exact implementation plans: introducing an
> additional reference indirection for every lookup will have a
> huge performance penalty as well.
> 
> Is your plan to only introduce the master table after an
> allocation has failed?

Right, obviously the extra indirections would only come into play
after a failed allocation.  As soon as we can run the worker thread
it'll try to remove the extra indirections by doing vmalloc.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/