Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dra7xx: mark dra7xx_pcie_msi irq as IRQF_NO_THREAD

[Pratyush Anand]

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Am Montag, den 07.12.2015, 21:33 -0600 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas:
>> [+cc Jingoo (exynos), Richard, Lucas (imx6), Pratyush (spear13xx)]
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:22:50PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> > On 12/04/2015 08:46 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> > > Hi Grygorii,
> [...]
>> > >>
>> > >> +        /*
>> > >> +         * Mark dra7xx_pcie_msi IRQ as IRQF_NO_THREAD
>> > >> +         * On -RT and if kernel is booting with "threadirqs" cmd line parameter
>> > >> +         * the dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler() will be forced threaded but,
>> > >> +         * in the same time, it's IRQ dispatcher and calls generic_handle_irq(),
>> > >> +         * which, in turn, will be resolved to handle_simple_irq() call.
>> > >> +         * The handle_simple_irq() expected to be called with IRQ disabled, as
>> > >> +         * result kernle will display warning:
>> > >> +         * "irq XXX handler YYY+0x0/0x14 enabled interrupts".
>> > >> +         */
>> > >>          ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pp->irq,
>> > >> -                               dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler, IRQF_SHARED,
>> > >> +                               dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler,
>> > >> +                               IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
>> > >>                                 "dra7-pcie-msi", pp);
>> > >
>> > > There's similar code in exynos_add_pcie_port(), imx6_add_pcie_port(),
>> > > and spear13xx_add_pcie_port().  Do they need similar changes?  If not,
>> > > why not?
>> > >
>> > > I see your discussion about DRA7 hardware design, but my impression is
>> > > that this problem affects anybody who calls dw_handle_msi_irq() from a
>> > > handler registered with IRQF_SHARED.
>> >
>> > Issue fixed by this patch is not related to IRQF_SHARED.
>> > It will happen on -RT or if kernel will boot with "threadirqs" cmd line parameter
>> > - in both cases these PCI IRQ handlers will be forced to be threaded and,
>> > as result, generic_handle_irq() will produce above backtrace.
>> >
>> > Personally, I don't have strong opinion about "should similar change be applied
>> > to other PCI drivers or not?" And I think, that owners of those driver should
>> > make such decision.
>>
>> If the same issue affects several drivers, I'd like to see them all
>> handle it the same way.  Otherwise, somebody coming along later will
>> wonder why they're different, and there won't be a good answer.
>>
>> I cc'd the other maintainers to see what they think.
>>

I too agree with the change for SPEAr13xx as well.

~Pratyush
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/