Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] power: domain: add pm_genpd_exit

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:47:58AM +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
> Example: the error case is while probing, how we react on a -EBUSY there
> "in an error case" -> simple ignore it? But then nobody see that the use
> of this function is wrong.

The proper way to deal with functionality that can only be registered
but never removed is to report the error, but never fail during probing,
and never allow removal (empty removal function.)

If you return a failure code during probe, you end up in an inconsistent
situation where you have facilities registered, but resources that those
facilities require will be undone when probe() returns a failure, and
that can potentially lead to kernel oops or scribbling over someone
elses device or memory.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/