Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-binding: power: Add otg regulator binding

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Wed 09 Dec 06:36 PST 2015, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Tim Bird <tim.bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 12/08/2015 08:11 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
> >>> Add a binding for the regulator which controls the OTG chargepath switch.
> >>> The OTG switch gets its power from pm8941_5vs1, and that should be
> >>> expressed as a usb-otg-in-supply property in the DT node for the
> >>> charger driver.  The regulator name is "otg".
> 
> [...]
> 
> >>> +child nodes:
> >>> +- otg:
> >>> +  Usage: optional
> >>> +  Description: This node defines a regulator used to control the direction
> >>> +               of VBUS voltage - specifically: whether to supply voltage
> >>> +               to VBUS for host mode operation of the OTG port, or allow
> >>> +               input voltage from external VBUS for charging.  In the
> >>> +               hardware, the supply for this regulator comes from
> >>> +               usb-otg-in-supply.
> >>
> >> Doesn't this regulator need to have a name defined?
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean.  The regulator name is "otg", defined by the DT node
> > name. The code requires that the DT node name be "otg", and defines a regulator
> > with the same name.
> >
> > As far as I know, you have to define a DT label for the node, in order
> > to reference this regulator with a phandle.  Is that what you are referring to?
> > I usually use "chg_otg" as the label.  Are you asking that this be reflected
> > in the example?
> 
> You need a regulator-name property. Also, should should define valid
> values for regulator-min-microvolt and regulator-max-microvolt.
> 

The regulator has a name, derived from the node name, and this is
significant. If the developer wants an additional human readable name
for some reason they can use the optional regulator-name property.

The regulator is a simple switch and as such inherits voltage properties
from its supply. It should therefor not have any specified voltage
range.

> Thinking about this some more, the node name should be generic, so
> just "regulator". The label does not need to be generic.
> 

The name of the node is significant, as it's used for matching the
regulator to an implementation.

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/